With the Clinton Record of Corruption, Why is she the Democrats leading Candidate?

The Clinton’s, both Bill and Hillary have been associated with a multitude of Felons and corrupt individuals for decades.. So Why on earth is Hillary the leading Dem Candidate for President?

Some of the Clinton Felonious connections include Mochtar Riady, who in 2001 had to pay $8 Million dollars in Federal Election Commission fines.  John Huang raised millions for the DNC nearly half of which had to be returned because of how it was raised or who it came from. Huang was also the organizer behind Al Gore’s Buddhist Temple fundraiser. As part of a plea agreement with federal prosecutors,  Johnny Chung was charged with funneling illegal contributions to the 1996 Clinton-Gore campaign by asking friends and employees of his office technology firm to make donations for which they were later reimbursed. Chung was also charged with engaging in a similar “straw donor” scheme to assist the 1996 reelection bid of Sen. John F. Kerry.

Clinton’s current Fundraising shennanigans include Norman Hsu, Peter Paul, and now another Chinese Straw Donor Scheme reported by the LA Times and The NY Post

While Clinton herself may have escaped any prosecution in these and other scandals, What this does prove is a pattern of conduct, and the extent the Clinton’s will go to enhance their own personal power.

Which Party was it that used a “Culture of Corruption” as a campaign slogan? Isn’t it time for Democrats to make it more than just a slogan, and dump Hillary?

Check out Proprieter Nation’s take on the 2008 election.

More on Clinton’s Chinatown Connection at MoreWhat.com

digg story

Advertisements

  1. The reason is that the MSM isn’t making an issue of it, and her rivals don’t want to attack her that hard. I personally fully believe that Dems will live to not only regret picking her knowing all of this baggage, but regret it big time.

    A skilled politician, and I am talking about Rudy here, will be able to expose all of these things to the public whether the MSM wants to cover it or not. You are absolutely right. Not only is Hillary tied to a major donor scandal from 1996 (in which dozens of people suddenly left the country), but another one from 2000 involving Peter Paul, and now two brand new ones. This is what I refer to as a pattern. This, along with her obvious social leanings, and polarizing personality, make her the dumbest choice to lead the party. That said, the true blue Dems seem to have grown enamored with her because they believe that she can take on the VRWC. That is fine, however, moderates don’t want a President whose sole positive trait is being able to take on the VRWC (that’s Vast Right Wing Conspiracy). They want someone who has serious solutions. She has changed her mind too many times to count on Iraq, twice on Iran, her whole economic agenda is essentially socialist, and her social agenda is far out secular progressive a la San Francisco. If the Dems think that will play in most of the country, they will be in for a big surprise in Nov. 2008. I recently wrote a post about how I think that 2008 will be a good year for Reps, and Hillary is one of my five pillars.

    Here is the post…

    http://proprietornation.blogspot.com/2007/10/dont-fret-reps2008-is-our-year.html

  2. Rockyspoon

    Contribution scandals are just a tip of the iceberg for Hillary. Consider the following:

    Back in 1969 a group of Black Panthers decided that a fellow black panther named Alex Rackley needed to die. Rakely was suspected of disloyalty. Raclkley was first tied to a chair. Once safely immobilized, his friends tortured him for hours by, among other things, pouring boiling water on him.

    When they got tired of torturing Rackley, Black Panther member Warren Kimbo took Rackley outside and put a bullet in his head. Rackley’s body was later found floating in a river about 25 miles north of New Haven, Conn.

    Perhaps at this point you’re curios as to what happened to these Black Panthers. In 1977, that’s only eight years later, only one of the killers was still in jail. The shooter, Warren Kimbro, managed to get a scholarship to Harvard, and became good friends with none other than Al Gore. He later became an assistant dean at an Eastern Connecticut State College. Isn’t that something?

    As a 60’s radical you can pump a bullet into someone’s head, and a few years later, in the same state, you can become an assistant college dean! Only in American!

    Erica Huggins was the lady who served the Panthers by boiling the water for Mr. Rackley’s torture. Some years later Ms. Huggins was elected to a California School Board.

    How in the world do you think these killers got off so easy? Maybe it was in some part due to the efforts of two people who came to her defense of the Panthers. These two people actually went so far as to shut down Yale University with demonstrations in defense of the accused Black Panthers during their trial.

    One of these people was none other than Bill Lan Lee. Mr. Lee, or Mr. Lan Lee, as the case may be, isn’t a college dean. He isn’t a member of a California School Board. He was, however, head of the US Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, appointed by none other than Bill Clinton.

    O.K., so who was the other Panther defender? Is this other notable Panther defender now a school board member? Is this other Panther apologist now an assistant college dean? No, neither! The other Panther defender was, like Lee, a radical law student at Yale University at the time. She is now known as the “Smartest Woman in the World.”.. She is none other than the Democratic senator from the State of New York—our former First Lady, the incredible Hillary Rodham Clinton.

  3. I’ve come to a very cynical view of why democrats only care about republican corruption. It isn’t that they care about corruption at all, any more than they are concerned about the pecadillos of senators Craig or Vitters, it’s always about the ideology and using whatever works to get the agenda.

    IOW, outing republicans isn’t about ‘hypocrisy’ it’s about embarassing them because they are vulnerable and accountable to the republican voter. Democrats do not suffer under such scrutiny. The down and dirty is what they vote for. Anything to get their agenda, don’t interrupt the welfare checks, and no fear of losing their union job no matter how lazy they are, abortion on demand, and funding for ridiculous academic research projects. It takes scoundrels to implement those giant ripoffs to the American taxpayer.

    This is the only explanation for Ted Kennedy, Barney Frank, Harry Reid, and company. It doesn’t matter that Murtha was caught on tape asking for a bribe in ABSCAM – how many times has he been re elected since? And Studds actually had an affair – it wasn’t an email – with an underage page and was re elected to four more terms. Jefferson is still sitting on committee although his trial is going on in VA. And the impeached Judge Hastings – what a profile in corruption that one is…

    You see, they are all scoundrels, that’s what democrats want. And as scoundrels go, it’s hard to find a bigger one than Hillary.

  4. Mike, Rocky, Kathy;

    Thank your comment, I added your link to the main post. I agree with you that Hillary’s corruption baggage could lead to Republican’s making gains in 2008. I am not so sure that Rudy is the candidate to lead the charge on Hillary & the corruption that accompanies her. In all honesty Other Democrats should be at this stage doing that very thing… The fact that they are not likely means that they are either positioning themselves for a VP spot or attempting to set themselves up for future elections.

    I am inclined to agree with Kathy here. Democrats could care less about corruption. Their only concern is about advancing their socialist agenda and increasing their grip on power.

    Thanks again for your comments

    Darrell

  5. Brad

    Rocky, et al

    I got suckered into your urban legend and a friend set me straight. I’m not sure if you intentionally did this, but here’s the link to show that it’s false. I’m no fan of Hillary, by any stretch of the imagination, but we can’t spread lies about her no matter how much she deserves it.
    http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/panthers.asp
    Check it out.

  1. 1 University Update - Hillary Clinton - With the Clinton Record of Corruption, Why is she the Democrats leading Candidate?

    […] Clark With the Clinton Record of Corruption, Why is she the Democrats leading Candidate? » This Summary is from an article posted at Morning Coffee on Tuesday, October 23, 2007 With the […]

  2. 2 Top Posts « WordPress.com

    […] With the Clinton Record of Corruption, Why is she the Democrats leading Candidate? The Clinton’s, both Bill and Hillary have been associated with a multitude of Felons and corrupt individuals for […] […]

  3. 3 Oil Prices near record highs… Energy independence is still nothing more than Rhetoric « Morning Coffee

    […] It certainly is not the Chinese…. But I am sure that with the right contributions to a Presidential wannabe the Federal Government will remain silent on the […]




Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s



%d bloggers like this: